Gestión directiva orientada a resultados y calidad educativa percibida por docentes en una institución pública
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
La gestión escolar orientada a resultados propone articular la planificación, la asignación de recursos, el acompañamiento pedagógico y la vinculación con el entorno para sostener la mejora institucional. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo examinar la relación entre la gestión directiva orientada a resultados y la calidad educativa percibida por docentes de una institución pública de Huaraz, Perú. Se desarrolló una investigación cuantitativa, no experimental, transversal y correlacional. Participaron 96 docentes de educación primaria y secundaria, correspondientes al censo de personal docente elegible durante 2024. Se aplicaron dos cuestionarios de 20 ítems con escala Likert de cinco categorías. La validez de contenido, estimada mediante V de Aiken, fue de .858; la consistencia interna alcanzó ? = .848 para gestión directiva y ? = .881 para calidad educativa. Los resultados sugieren que, en este caso institucional, las prácticas que conectan a la escuela con familias y actores comunitarios, así como las acciones pedagógicas, concentran las asociaciones más altas con la calidad percibida. Dado el diseño transversal y el uso de autoinformes, los hallazgos expresan covariación y no permiten establecer efectos causales. Se recomienda fortalecer ciclos participativos de uso de evidencias, acompañamiento docente y comunicación bidireccional con la comunidad
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
El contenido de los articulos es de exclusiva responsabilidad de los autores.
Deberá cumplir con los siguentes aspectos de la Licencia CC BY NC ND :
- Atribución : Debe otorgar el crédito correspondiente, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se realizaron cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de ninguna manera que sugiera que el licenciante lo respalda a usted o su uso.
- No Comercial : No se puede utilizar el material con fines comerciales.
- Sin derivados : Si remezcla, transforma o construye sobre el material, no puede distribuir el material modificado.
- Sin restricciones adicionales : No se pueden aplicar términos legales o medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otros de hacer cualquier cosa que permita la licencia.
Citas
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2016). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9264-2
Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009048817385
Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345980090203
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632431003663214
Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2023). The importance of school leadership? What we know. School Leadership & Management, 43(5), 449–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2023.2287806
Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209340042
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430701800060
Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2018). Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 501–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18769048
Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X03253412
Mora-Ruano, J. G., Schurig, M., & Wittmann, E. (2021). Instructional leadership as a vehicle for teacher collaboration and student achievement: What the German PISA 2015 sample tells us. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 582773. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.582773
Poortman, C. L., & Schildkamp, K. (2016). Solving student achievement problems with a data use intervention for teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.06.010
Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
Ronfeldt, M., Farmer, S. O., McQueen, K., & Grissom, J. A. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 475–514. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215585562
Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C. L., Ebbeler, J., & Pieters, J. M. (2019). How school leaders can build effective data teams: Five building blocks for a new wave of data-informed decision making. Journal of Educational Change, 20(3), 283–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09345-3
Smith, T. E., Holmes, S. R., Sheridan, S. M., Cooper, J. M., Bloomfield, B. S., & Preast, J. L. (2021). The effects of consultation-based family-school engagement on student and parent outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 31(3), 278–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2020.1749062
Smith, T. E., Sheridan, S. M., Kim, E. M., Park, S., & Beretvas, S. N. (2020). The effects of family-school partnership interventions on academic and social-emotional functioning: A meta-analysis exploring what works for whom. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 511–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09509-w
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
Sullivan, G. M., & Artino, A. R., Jr. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541–542. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-5-4-18
Sun, R., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2014). Are performance management practices associated with better outcomes? Empirical evidence from New York public schools. The American Review of Public Administration, 44(3), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012468058
Tan, C. Y., Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2024). How school leadership practices relate to student outcomes: Insights from a three-level meta-analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(1), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211061445
Tan, C. Y., Gao, L., & Shi, M. (2022). Second-order meta-analysis synthesizing the evidence on associations between school leadership and different school outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(3), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220935456
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004