For the Aula Virtual Magazine, with its objective of promoting the dissemination of scientific knowledge and reflective critical thinking in the research field, it has the collaboration of the national and international evaluating committee - reviewers outside of its editorial team, advisory council and the institution. editor, will be subject to:

The assignment of the evaluating referees - reviewers of a production will be carried out taking into account the specialty and competence corresponding to the subject area of ​​the content to be evaluated.

The evaluating referees - reviewers must be responsible and:

• Refrain from evaluating productions if they present any conflict of interest.
• Comply with the stipulated times for evaluating them.
• Use the evaluation formats or scales provided.

Products received for review must be treated confidentially, as inside information and will not be used for personal gain. The review of the products will be carried out objectively. Comments should be clearly formulated in order to improve the investigation.

The Aula Virtual Magazine undertakes to annually publish the update of its bank of evaluating arbitrators - reviewers and deliver once the evaluation process is completed, the proof of arbitration via email in recognition of the work and criteria, this being fundamental for acceptance or rejection of the scientific product.

The evaluating arbitrators - reviewers will not receive any financial benefit for the evaluation process.